4. Rooted Right In

Some Things Can Change, But Not All Things Can.

This is the 5th posting in a series of 73, released every 5th day in 2025

0. Momentum Metanoia 1. The Root: Fuel’s Potential 2. The Organism Prism 3. From All to Part

Four signifies a personal aim upon the spectrum in relation to where the individual is positioned. As evidenced, there are two spectra in this layering example. One spectrum is the quality of life as measured between the ideal image versus death. Another is measured in the concept of “green” (as mentioned in #3) for one specific type of genetic sequence existing in an environment which has had a challenging influence introduced. As individualization takes place, which is an action unto itself, the individual then recognizes personal action is necessary to build momentum in this direction.

For each of the individual identities which exist upon the spectrum called “green,” it is not within their control to change their position. Some are closer in hue to blue, some closer to yellow; some expressing subtle variations of red or purple, etc. These are genetic variations within the current time, established upon the records of the genetic sequence- these genetic variations likely come with particular beneficial or detrimental attributes to the health of the individual within the environment. These genetic variations might come with a natural immunity to some agent of disease which is not prevalent in the environment and as such is not recognized as immunity; they might also come with a hardiness or subtle resiliency based on the location the plant is rooted- factors such as a north-facing slope, or poor draining soil, or heavy shade cover from factors in the environment would impact the ability to grow and flourish relative to others who are positioned in an ideal place.

From the perspective of those outside “green,” these distinctions in appearance are trivial if recognized at all- some are growing larger and fuller, others appear to be stunted in growth or duller in how the colors are presenting. Because of the homeostasis of the general environment, this comparison is a matter of superficial “fate and fortune.” Some appear to be favored more than others in the dealings of nature.

As it goes with the dealings of nature, the tides of fate and fortune shift with the appearance of factors yet imagined or considered. For those within the example of “green,” the ideal aim is to sustain vitality for the sake of generating pure seeds. For most, the environmental factors have remained stable and predictable for generations to ensure prolific seed production resulting in a dense population within the habitat. For others, the environmental factors have remained stable and predictable in different ways, resulting in low-yield seed production of very strong and resilient plants that grow very slowly and are not the dominant presence within the habitat. Which population would be more adaptive to external influence becoming introduced?